Experts say COVID relief money is too generous with companies, tough on workers – National

Economists said the benefits rolled out at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic allowed vulnerable Canadians to stay healthy while maintaining income, but business support was excessive and shows the outsized impact of business groups on public policy.

For nearly two and a half years, the federal government has faced the unprecedented task of shutting down the economy to slow the rapid spread of COVID-19. This shutdown has led to a series of pandemic relief benefits aimed at cushioning the blow to workers and businesses, the two most notable programs being Canada Emergency Response Benefits (CERB) and Canada Emergency Wage Support (CEWS).

Recent analysis from Statistics Canada based on census data shows that two-thirds of Canadian adults received pandemic benefits in 2020, with these benefits mitigating income losses and reducing inequality.

Read more:

How many Canadians have received COVID benefits? This is what the 2021 census says

The story continues below the ad

Previous analysis from the Federal Statistics Agency also found, as expected, that use of the wage support program was associated with a lower likelihood of closures and fewer employees.

While there was little time to spend on formulating benefits and fine-tuning the details in March 2020, economists are now assessing the successes and failures of these programs at a later date.

Any assessment needs to take into account the uncertainty people and governments were facing at the time and the urgent need to keep people healthy, says City University of New York economics professor Miles Korak, who has written analyzes of these programs.

However, Korac said that while CERB has been “terribly successful,” Canada’s emergency wage support has been a “huge failure.”

“Canada’s emergency response feature was able to get funds quickly in time to keep people at home, which is what we wanted to do to save lives,” he said.

On the other hand, Korak said that CEWS “came too late, were not well targeted and overindulged in (companies) insurance.”

CERB was quickly announced in March 2020 and $2,000 per month for Canadians who have lost income due to the pandemic shutdown. This was soon followed by CEWS, which subsidized corporate employee wages by 75 percent in hopes of encouraging companies to retain their employees.

The story continues below the ad

Click to play the video:

Financial Matters: Dealing with CERB . Payment

Financial Matters: Dealing with CERB Payment – June 8, 2022

Korac says that by the time the wage subsidy was introduced, many companies had already separated from their employees.

Another source of criticism of the wage subsidy program was that it subsidizes the wages of all workers in the affected firms, rather than just those whose jobs were at risk of being lost, making it particularly costly.

Jennifer Robson, associate professor of political administration at Carleton University, noted that the wage subsidy program is not working. Robson said businesses that would otherwise close for reasons unrelated to the pandemic have been kept afloat due to wage subsidies.

“This was not a business that would return to profitability,” Robson said.

Statistics Canada data shows that the number of business closings increased significantly in April 2020, but followed by a sharp decline, bringing the monthly closings down to a lower level than they were before the pandemic.

The story continues below the ad

About 31,000 companies closed in August 2020, while nearly 40,000 companies closed in February 2020.

Read more:

Women with college degrees are more likely to reach CERB than male graduates: StatCan

In hindsight, Korac said the wage support program should have been smaller in scope and targeted at larger companies with specialized needs where it would be important for companies to retain the same employees, such as the aviation sector.

The Canadian Federation of Independent Business said wage support was “crucial” for small business owners and noted in April of this year that only two out of five of its members reported a return to normal sales.

Adrian Fabshas, ​​press secretary to Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland, said in a statement that the government’s focus at the start of the pandemic was on protecting jobs and ensuring a strong economic recovery.

“Today we have regained 114 percent of the jobs we lost during the darkest months of the pandemic,” said Fopschas.

Contrary to what some economists have described as a very generous subsidy for businesses, some low-income Canadians have struggled with reclaiming social assistance benefits because they collected CERB. The Canada Revenue Agency is also hoping to recover benefits paid to more than 400,000 Canadians whose eligibility has been questioned.

The story continues below the ad

Click to play the video:

Ontario’s healthcare system is facing a staff shortage

Ontario’s healthcare system is facing a staff shortage

In response, the 2000 Anti-Poverty Campaign Group called for CERB to be pardoned.

Korac said that while it is reasonable to ask those who fraudulently collected benefits to pay them back, companies should adhere to the same standards.

“What worried me was the inconsistency in this response between individuals and companies,” Korac said.

The CFIB called for more loan forgiveness for small businesses that took out loans through the Canada Business Emergency Account. The federal government is already offering partial loan forgiveness if repayment is made by the end of 2023.

Robson said that when it comes to shaping public policy, business interest groups have well-resourced PR teams to advance their interests.

“There is no such thing for low-paid working individuals,” Robson said.

The story continues below the ad

Korak noted that at the start of the pandemic, there was a focus on the role of frontline workers, but over time, this shifted to small businesses.

“I think the Small Business Lobby has been very effective in informing individual MPs and putting pressure on Cabinet and the government to respond in a way that many invisible and unheard mothers, fathers, workers and families have not had the same voice,” Korac said. .

The danger of the wage subsidy program, Korac said, is that it sets a precedent for excessively subsidizing companies and thus stifling innovation.

“We are moving towards basic income for small businesses rather than basic income for individuals,” he said.

© 2022 Canadian Press

Leave a Comment